Sandboxie Support

I think we got close to that here;
http://www.sandboxie.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=4815
But never really pulled the trigger on it.

It's probably an IE thing here then, thanks. So the standalone installer may be a good recco for this problem I guess.

Funny that link doesn't act that way here. It starts the download and just automatically goes right to install - no options given to run or save.

From that link; "C:\Program Files\Sandboxie\Start.exe" /box:123456 "C:\WINDOWS\explorer.exe" /e,"ABCDEF" 123456: name of your selected sandbox ABCDEF: path of your downloads folder (in my case, C:\Documents and Settings\XXXXXX\Desktop), where XXXXXX is the name of my user account. That is a nice tip...

Exact same here as Guest10. One thing that I don't understand is if you use the link that Julian provided, and if the problem is that no other programs are running in that sandbox ... wouldn't the browser that you used to reach the link be running in the sandbox?

While testing, why don't you set the real Temporary Internet Folder location to the usb drive and start the browser UNsandboxed. See what Windows does when you disconnect the usb, and then compare that to when you are sandboxed.

hmm Might be something different with the standalone installer. This thing installs clean, fully, and runs all day. (or maybe because I have BITS and AU services disabled?)

Edit; nope it's not the services - I enabled and started BITS and AU and I still get a good sandboxed install.

If it is a registered installation of Sandboxie, you can use the Force Folder setting on that "New Folder" (or rename it something else) and Sandboxie will remember it if the folder is deleted and recreated.

Try it with the Chrome standalone installer.
http://www.askvg.com/official-link-to-d ... installer/

1. Download and save to real desktop
2. Create a new sandbox
3. Right click on the downloaded file on the desktop - Run Sandboxed - choose the newly created sandbox.

I like the 'Summary' best;

Today's most popular security solutions simply do not work.

Where is SnD anyway.

All you have posted is what this link already says;
http://www.sandboxie.com/index.php?SBIE2331

Did you try rebooting?

Then if that is true that they added after the original article was placed on the web for all to see - then they are in fact admitting they were wrong to leave it out in the first place. If the 'Related Work' was listed in the original, and just was not noticed - they knew they should mention it. So...

Buster wrote:

MitchE323 wrote:What is wrong with the "Related Work" link?

Was "related work" included in the initial release or has been added after the critics?

Rectificar es de sabios.

Maybe they added it after this thread.

What is wrong with the "Related Work" link?

Are you guys meeting the system requirements for that program?