Search found 2393 matches
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:26 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: sandboxie 4.20
- Replies: 107
- Views: 10229
Re: sandboxie 4.20
Main developer of a software product wasting time with childish replies. Very nice!
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:24 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: sandboxie 4.20
- Replies: 107
- Views: 10229
Re: sandboxie 4.20
Childish attitude from someone that should stay professional and respectful and be opened to critics when these critics are objetive and shared by more users. I was the first one to say that when Ronen, just one person, was developing the product the support was better. Now more users say the same. ...
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:19 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: sandboxie 4.20
- Replies: 107
- Views: 10229
Re: sandboxie 4.20
Norm wrote: @Buster: As long as everyone stays professional and respectful, no one gets banned. If Norm considers is not respectful to say that new engineer is not doing the tasks it was supposed to do, then Norm should come back to the forum and tell me that directly to me. Some users asked Norm to...
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:05 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: sandboxie 4.20
- Replies: 107
- Views: 10229
Re: sandboxie 4.20
It is even more tiresome that new engineer is not doing the tasks that Norm promised he would do and that should have solved, at least partially if not totally, the support issues we finally agreeded Sandboxie has. Product is getting worst and worst and this traduces in complaints of more and more u...
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:04 pm
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE Bypassed? [No]
- Replies: 54
- Views: 6316
Re: SBIE Bypassed?
If Sandboxie can not assure protection when UAC is not disabled that should be warned, shouldn´t it?
- Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:08 pm
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE Bypassed? [No]
- Replies: 54
- Views: 6316
Re: SBIE Bypassed?
Again Sandboxie 3.x shows to be more robust than new 4.x line.
The change from 3.x to 4.x was really a big step back not only in software compatibility terms but more important in security terms. And we were told 4.x was more restrictive than 3.x. Sure, sure...
The change from 3.x to 4.x was really a big step back not only in software compatibility terms but more important in security terms. And we were told 4.x was more restrictive than 3.x. Sure, sure...
- Tue Aug 04, 2015 9:37 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: Thunderbird version 38.1.0 can't copy and no links
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1509
Re: Thunderbird version 38.1.0 can't copy and no links
That was not what it used to be when Ronen was leading the project, that´s for sure.peschiber wrote:Thanks for your hint but if feel lik someone is pulling my leg when I read: "Only VERY limmited number of programs acually work when 'installed" directly to a sandbox."
- Mon Aug 03, 2015 11:11 am
- Forum: Beta Version 5.01
- Topic: 5.01 Beta Available (latest version 5.04 RC)
- Replies: 800
- Views: 234505
Re: 5.01 Beta Available (latest version 5.01.4)
http://www.sandboxie.com/SandboxieInstall32-501-3.exehenryg wrote:[Edit] How do I get hold of older betas? Help please!!
http://www.sandboxie.com/SandboxieInstall32-501-2.exe
http://www.sandboxie.com/SandboxieInstall32-501-1.exe
- Sat Jul 18, 2015 6:17 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: 4.xx-5.01: extremal degradation of performance
- Replies: 3
- Views: 754
Re: 4.xx-5.01: extremal degradation of performance
Hats off to this problem report!
- Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:40 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: BSOD
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1331
Re: BSOD
Gator: Is "zamguard32.sys" still present in your system even after uninstall?
- Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:38 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: BSOD
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1331
Re: BSOD
zamguard is not present in the dump files.Curt@invincea wrote:This is caused by zamguard32.sys -- just like before.
http://forums.sandboxie.com/phpBB3/view ... zamguard32
How comes it caused the BSOD?
- Sun Jul 12, 2015 11:10 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: Firefox 39.0 Incompatible with Sandboxie
- Replies: 2
- Views: 844
Re: Firefox 39.0 Incompatible with Sandboxie
Empty the sandbox.
- Sun Jul 12, 2015 4:36 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: Where are all these options?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1011
Re: Where are all these options?
Yes, that´s right. And even then it´s not assured they will work.TheGeneralPencil wrote:That's quite sad. Does that mean I have to revert to an older version in order to be able to use them?Bellzemos wrote:Those options are completely removed from version 4 on.
- Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:55 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: OpenWinClass not working properly
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5375
Re: OpenWinClass not working properly
You wrote:
OpenWinClass=FirefoxMessageWindow
OpenWinClass=FirefoxMessageWindow/IgnoreUIPI
What about?It used to work by opening "FirefoxMessageWindow" in OpenWinClass to make it possible for the instance inside the sandbox contacting the instance outside the Sandbox
OpenWinClass=FirefoxMessageWindow
OpenWinClass=FirefoxMessageWindow/IgnoreUIPI
- Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:28 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: OpenWinClass not working properly
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5375
Re: OpenWinClass not working properly
OpenWinClass=TFormBSA
OpenWinClass=TFormBSA/IgnoreUIPI
That´s the method used to get BSA working. In your case you should replace "TFormBSA" for the caption name of the process you want to communicate between system and sandbox.
OpenWinClass=TFormBSA/IgnoreUIPI
That´s the method used to get BSA working. In your case you should replace "TFormBSA" for the caption name of the process you want to communicate between system and sandbox.