Search found 91 matches
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:37 pm
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
Hi again, I just updated to v5.14 hoping this would have been fixed, but it hasn't yet. I wonder if you've made any findings? It's literally the only problem I'm having with SB, everything else is working silky-smooth. I would suggest you try yourself hitting Ctrl+C on a large file (e.g. an ISO imag...
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 3:03 am
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
I believe that is expected behavior. But I'll let Curt confirm when he can. Sorry I forgot to add that, even if it's expected behaviour (and I can't really see how), you surely you can see why I find it disadvantageous: ● Each time I hit ctrl+c on a file, a new copy is made (if I ctrl+c 5 times the...
- Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:55 am
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
Sorry about the bump.
I'm using 5.12, it also happened in 5.10 though.
At the moment everything else is working smooth. All the problems I had with Sandboxie under Win7 are gone since I upgraded to Wīn10.
I'm using 5.12, it also happened in 5.10 though.
At the moment everything else is working smooth. All the problems I had with Sandboxie under Win7 are gone since I upgraded to Wīn10.
- Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:52 am
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
Bump. This is proving to be quite a problem for me. I just downloaded a large software installer package (~500 MB) using my web browser, then clicked "Open containing folder". Since the browser is running sandboxed, the Exploer window spawned by my web browser is also sandboxed. As soon as I hit Ctr...
- Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:26 am
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
First and foremost thanks for your replies. I inspected my sandboxie.ini file which contains the following command: ... OpenPipePath=C:\Users\%UserName%\AppData\Local\Temp ... I originally used that in some sandboxes that are "non-disposable", meaning that program installers were run in the sandbox ...
- Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:11 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C0000022
- Replies: 6
- Views: 833
Re: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C00000
Just to report back, I just realised I haven't seen the message for a while, which means that restarting the system must have done the trick. Hopefully I won't see it again!
- Thu Jun 02, 2016 12:38 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C0000022
- Replies: 6
- Views: 833
Re: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C00000
Not that I know of, I have disabled (I always do) Windows Firewall and Windows Defender. But based on what you are saying, it looks like I'm going to have to do a bit of digging. I'll report back if I find the culprit, thanks.
- Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:57 pm
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C0000022
- Replies: 6
- Views: 833
Re: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C00000
Any sandboxed program, for example Notepad.
I've done a test and renamed sandboxie.ini so that Sandboxie starts off with fresh settings, but the error still pops up when I copy anything.
I've done a test and renamed sandboxie.ini so that Sandboxie starts off with fresh settings, but the error still pops up when I copy anything.
- Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:30 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C0000022
- Replies: 6
- Views: 833
SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C0000022
(Windows 10 64-bit Professional, SBIE v5.10) Recently I've started getting the following error every time I copy anything, including text, from a sandboxed program: SBIE2205 Service not implemented: CloseClipboard C0000022 I believed it could be a Windows update, but being on Windows 10 I have no ch...
- Mon May 30, 2016 2:08 am
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
Sorry, that was supposed to read "It's not anything to do with..."
- Sun May 29, 2016 6:32 pm
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
Re: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns
Thanks for your reply. Firstly, it's anything to do with my drives are encrypted: I use TrueCrypt which uses on-the-fly encryption, which means everything happens on RAM. Encrypted volumes are mounted as regular partitions and, as far as applications are concerned, look no different from real non-en...
- Sun May 29, 2016 1:25 pm
- Forum: Quick Questions
- Topic: SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4878
SBIE_Temp privacy concerns [SOLVED]
Sandboxie v5.10 on Windows 10 Pro x64, I've just noticed every time I copy a file from a sandboxed Explorer window, Sandboxie will create a copy of the file in: C:\Users\<user_name>\AppData\Local\Temp\SBIE_Temp\<random_alphanumeric_chars>\<file_name> For example, after copying a file from my desktop...
- Tue May 24, 2016 8:40 am
- Forum: Problem Reports
- Topic: ConfigLevel issues & questions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 672
Re: ConfigLevel issues & questions
Thanks guys!
- Tue May 24, 2016 2:33 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Small website suggestion
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5048
Re: Small website suggestion
OK no problem take your time guys In the meantime, I'll just ask on the forums when all else fails.
- Mon May 16, 2016 12:19 pm
- Forum: Contributed Utilities & Templates
- Topic: BoxNameTitle=- vs BoxNameTitle=n [SOLVED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5428
Re: BoxNameTitle=- vs BoxNameTitle=n
Thanks for the detailed reply, that's very helpful
BTW did you find that out "empirically" or is it documented somewhere?
BTW did you find that out "empirically" or is it documented somewhere?