Reinstalled Sandboxie: Now I can't print again (RESOLVED)

[Unknown_User_701]

Tzuk,

All of my printing problems had been resolved by your last fix. V2.86 was running smoothly. However, this morning I decided to uninstall and resintall sandboxie as I was having an issue with the quick recover.

After uninstalling and reinstalling, now I can no longer print while sandboxed. I keep getting the same script error I used to get:

Line 1872
Char: 1
Error: Unspecified error
Code: 0
URL: res://iefram.dll/preview.dlg

Running the mvps program called DEFAULT BROWSER does not help

[SnDPhoenix]

wth? maybe there is something missing from your ini file?

[Unknown_User_701]

Does Tzuk (or anyone) have a complete sandboxie uninstall file?

I uninstalled today, cleaned the registry, and reinstalled. But somehow Sandboxie rememembed that it was already registered. I did not need to reregister the program.

That makes me think that maybe I need to totally uninstall all traces of the program from my PC, reinstall, then reregister.

I can live with the Quick recover problem. But the print problem is something that I absolutely must fix.

[Unknown_User_701]

[quote="SnDPhoenix"]wth? maybe there is something missing from your ini file?[/quote]

You got it. The ini file did not contain the Open path = Printers-spool* edit. I thought that this would be a standard part of V2.86 but I guess it is not.

I added this fix and resolved the pronting issue.

[SnDPhoenix]

Sweet, i figured that was the problem, glad its working for you now. Also i think the reason it isnt added by default is because not everyone has a printing problem with SBIE, and because not everyone has the problem, adding that line to someones ini that isnt having a problem printing might CAUSE a problem with them printing, so its better to just add the line(s) if your having a problem, rather than have it there by default and cause more problems.

[tzuk]

Well, I did intend for this to be default. Since obviously it didn't happen, that must mean I've messed up somewhere. I guess I'll look into this again before the next version.