Mr.X wrote:Another pov of mine:
If a well known fast food hamburger chain gets multi-billionaire, why these people, IT (software makers) won't get rich with intangible goods that require talent, brain, super hard work for development. This is the information era, these people needs to be rewarded with the big money.
Hamburgers makers getting richer? eek!!!
Technology makers getting rich? Good!!! (Good technology not garbage like phone cell industry)
That's true, I'm on your side. I'm willed to pay more for SB than hamburgers.
Take Microsoft Windows as an example. You buy Version "...", you can use it as long as you want. At some time the next version will apear and you can upgrade your old OS to the new one.
They made a lot of money with this kind of selling. So why not with SB?
Curt@invincea wrote:SandboxieUser42 wrote:No, maybe you got me wrong or I didn't wrote clearly. I did not mean the gift as you owning. I mean the full version of SB after you paid for. After purchasing it there is no more work to be done to use it an infinite amount of time. If the devs did some updates I am fine to pay again for it.
Hear that guys? No more work to be done. I'm going for that Mediterranean cruise! See ya!
Mr.X wrote:
@Curt
Thank you for pointing this out, this is the most stupid thing I've ever heard or read in my digital life...
![Shocked :shock:](images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
:
SandboxieUser42 wrote:No, maybe you got me wrong or I didn't wrote clearly. I did not mean the gift as you owning. I mean the full version of SB after you paid for. After purchasing it there is no more work to be done to use it an infinite amount of time. If the devs did some updates I am fine to pay again for it.
W T F ?????
So tell me please one thing a developer need to done, which hinder me using it for infinite amount of time.
There is no more work to be done to maintain the capability on a static system. I'm able to use it as long I want without any work done by the devs (example please, if you think not).
In normal usage a static system is an unreal behaviour. Over time the programs, functions and content I use will change. Incompatibility and/or errors may appear.
I might can live with that. If not I could buy an update for SB.
So please add at least a lifetime version without updates.
You may also compute the average usage time of an user, add some profit constants and multiply it by the annual usage cost.
Even if you say 120 (years of human life) times 15€ is 1800€. There will still some people who would buy this. To maximize profit a lower price would
probably be more valuable. As I told before I would pay about 100€ for it. I am pretty sure that it's more than you get from an average user.
bo.elam wrote:SandboxieUser42, maintaining Sandboxie is continous work, it never stops. Take Chrome as an example, search for Chrome and read the posts from the past few months and you ll see that its taken a lot of effort and work from the people working in Sandboxie to keep Chrome working well under Sandboxie, after every Chrome update.
Bo.
So, they did an update. If I need it, I am willing to pay for it (as I wrote before). If I don't need the added feature/function and can live with some incompatibility and/or errors there is no reason
to pay for something I don't need.
Mr.X wrote:
Bo, thanks for your explanation but I really don't think people currently don't know about the hard and ongoing updation a good quality software undergoes. Much less people that understand or barely understand Sandboxie added value. I perceive, in this case (SandboxieUser42), a mere trolling posts, otherwise this user needs to self-educate quite a bit more.
As I wrote several times before I would pay for these updates if I need them. So, please do not argue against something that no one had said.
Mr.X wrote:
@anyone
For any other beggars trying to be cheap (sorry for being rude), remember my clumsy analogy already posted:
As I wrote several times before I'm willed to pay more than the average user, just not every year.
JoeHood wrote:The hambuger analogy needs also the free version. How about this; you are hungry, you go to a place that is world famous for their hamburgers. That is how they make their profit. The chef is also world famous for his soup. It has bits of the same exact hamburger in the soup. The owner gives you the soup for free, because you are hungry. And he keeps giving you free soup, no matter how often you come in. You bring your friends, and he gives them free soup also. But if you want the hambuger you need to pay for it.
And if the chef goes to chef school and improves his hamburger, he might charge more for his hamburger. But if he does not learn anything new, that does not mean that he now has to give the hamburger away for free.
It's still an unfitting comparison because you need to produce the whole hamburger every time (the soup as well). But let's take this as an initial cost (for SB). If I want some improvements of the hamburger, the cost of that would be small compared to the hamburger (cost for upgrades).
So in Software you could have an initial cost for all work already done and a smaller cost for updates.
More fitting example would be your hardware system. You can run it as long you want. Over time the performance becomes worse and you can buy an upgrade for your PC.
--
I'm willed to pay for SB and for updates. I am also willing to pay for it before the work has been done.
One year is just a too short time.